Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 40

Review

doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0590-viii.

Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic examination accuracy: a systematic review

Affiliations

• PMID: 29017574
• PMCID: PMC5633882
• DOI: x.1186/s13643-017-0590-8

Free PMC article

Review

Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accurateness: a systematic review

Trevor A McGrath  et al. Syst Rev. 2017 .

Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: This report is to perform a systematic review of existing guidance on quality of reporting and methodology for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) in order to compile a list of potential items that might be included in a reporting guideline for such reviews: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).

Methods: Report protocol published on EQUATOR website. Articles in total text or abstract form that reported on whatever aspect of reporting systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy were eligible for inclusion. Nosotros used the Ovid platform to search Ovid MEDLINE®, Ovid MEDLINE® In-Procedure & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Embase Classic+Embase through May five, 2016. The Cochrane Methodology Annals in the Cochrane Library (Wiley version) was also searched. Championship and abstract screening followed past total-text screening of all search results was performed independently by ii investigators. Guideline organization websites, published guidance statements, and the Cochrane Handbook for Diagnostic Test Accuracy were also searched. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accurateness (STARD) were assessed independently by two investigators for relevant items.

Results: The literature searched yielded 6967 results; 386 were included afterward title and abstract screening and 203 later on full-text screening. Afterward reviewing the existing literature and guidance documents, a preliminary list of 64 items was compiled into the post-obit categories: title (3 items); introduction (two items); methods (35 items); results (13 items); discussion (9 items), and disclosure (two items).

Conclusion: Items on the methods and reporting of DTA systematic reviews in the present systematic review will provide a basis for generating a PRISMA extension for DTA systematic reviews.

Disharmonize of interest argument

Ideals approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval is not required for this blazon of written report at the authors' institutions.

Consent for publication

All authors provide consent for publication.

Competing interests

David Moher is Editor-in-Main of Systematic Reviews. No other relevant competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. one

Study flow diagram

Similar articles

• Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.

  McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM; and the PRISMA-DTA Grouping, Clifford T, Cohen JF, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Hooft L, Hunt HA, Hyde CJ, Korevaar DA, Leeflang MMG, Macaskill P, Reitsma JB, Rodin R, Rutjes AWS, Salameh JP, Stevens A, Takwoingi Y, Tonelli M, Weeks L, Whiting P, Willis BH. McInnes MDF, et al. JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(four):388-396. doi: x.1001/jama.2017.19163. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29362800

• Abyss of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.

  Salameh JP, McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Frank R, Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A, Kraaijpoel N, Levis B, Bossuyt PM. Salameh JP, et al. Clin Chem. 2019 Feb;65(two):291-301. doi: x.1373/clinchem.2018.292987. Epub 2018 Sep twenty. Clin Chem. 2019. PMID: 30237150

• Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-intendance ultrasound: a meta-enquiry study.

  Prager R, Pratte M, Guy A, Bala S, Bachar R, Kim DJ, Millington S, Salameh JP, McGrath TA, McInnes MD. Prager R, et al. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Mar 30:bmjebm-2020-111652. doi: x.1136/bmjebm-2020-111652. Online alee of print. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021. PMID: 33785511

• The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review.

  Willis BH, Quigley M. Willis BH, et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Dec ix;11:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-163. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011. PMID: 22151233 Free PMC article. Review.

• Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.

  Kelly SE, Moher D, Clifford TJ. Kelly SE, et al. Syst Rev. 2016 May 10;v:79. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0258-nine. Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27160255 Free PMC commodity. Review.

Cited by 31 articles

• Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Periodical of Radiology.

  Park HY, Suh CH, Woo Due south, Kim PH, Kim KW. Park HY, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2022 Mar;23(3):355-369. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0808. Korean J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35213097 Free PMC commodity.

• Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Ultrasonography vs Computed Tomography for Papillary Thyroid Cancer Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-assay.

  Alabousi Thou, Alabousi A, Adham Due south, Pozdnyakov A, Ramadan Southward, Chaudhari H, Immature JEM, Gupta M, Harish Due south. Alabousi M, et al. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 February ane;148(2):107-118. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3387. JAMA Otolaryngol Caput Cervix Surg. 2022. PMID: 34817554

• Prevalence and Significance of Hypermetabolic Lymph Nodes Detected by 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

  Treglia G, Cuzzocrea M, Giovanella Fifty, Elzi L, Muoio B. Treglia G, et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Aug iii;xiv(viii):762. doi: 10.3390/ph14080762. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34451859 Free PMC article. Review.

• Diffusion tensor imaging in cubital tunnel syndrome.

  Griffiths TT, Flather R, Teh I, Haroon HA, Shelley D, Plein S, Bourke Yard, Wade RG. Griffiths TT, et al. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 22;11(1):14982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94211-vii. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34294771 Free PMC article.

• Relative sensitivity of anterior nares and nasopharyngeal swabs for initial detection of SARS-CoV-two in ambulatory patients: Rapid review and meta-analysis.

  Zhou Y, O'Leary TJ. Zhou Y, et al. PLoS 1. 2021 Jul 20;16(7):e0254559. doi: ten.1371/periodical.pone.0254559. eCollection 2021. PLoS Ane. 2021. PMID: 34283845 Gratis PMC article. Review.

References

1. 1. Singh H, Graber ML. Improving diagnosis in health care—the side by side imperative for patient condom. Northward Engl J Med. 2015;373:2493–2495. doi: x.1056/NEJMp1512241. - DOI - PubMed
2. 1. McInnes MD, Bossuyt PM. Pitfalls of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in imaging inquiry. Radiology. 2015;277:13–21. doi: x.1148/radiol.2015142779. - DOI - PubMed
3. 1. Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP. Relative commendation touch of various report designs in the wellness sciences. JAMA. 2005;293:2362–2366. doi: ten.1001/jama.293.19.2362. - DOI - PubMed
4. 1. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323:334–336. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
5. 1. Institute of Medicine (US) Commission on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Press (U.s.); 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209539/.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more than resource

• Full Text Sources

  • BioMed Central
  • Europe PubMed Cardinal
  • PubMed Central

• Other Literature Sources

  • scite Smart Citations

willisoutworight.blogspot.com

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29017574/

Share this post